The first part of The Stranger is parallel to the second part. But, at the same time, they both focus on opposite versions of Meursault. The book is parallel in a very literal sense because of its physical structure. Meursault is a different person in the second half. He grows in unexpecting ways, and his character develops as he slowly indulges more information about himself. The main difference between the first and second parts is the sentence structure. Meursault narrates using concise and literal sentences in the first half of the novel. His longer sentences are describing literal things, facts, or his surroundings. He almost never analyzes his emotions, and we get little information on his past. In the second half, Meursault opens up a bit. He shows more emotion, his sentences get longer, and he shows a more analytical side of himself. Compared to the first half of the book, Meursault uses longer sentences. Even though the majority of his statements are just accounts of events that occurred, he gives a lot more statements on how he feels during his trial. He asks a lot of rhetorical questions and delves deeper into his emotions. He narrates how bothered he is by his lack of representation in the trial, and talks through his emotions about why his own account might not even matter (98). There are fewer facts represented in the second half of the book, and they are replaced with more of Meursault’s emotions. He says that “I didn’t feel much remorse for what I’d done… I would have liked to have tried explaining to him cordially, almost affectionately, that I had never been able to truly feel remorse for anything” (100). Even though this statement is more about his lack of emotion, we still get more information on how he feels than in the first half. In the first half of the book, when Meursault says he would “like to do” something, it is usually a physical action to satisfy a physical desire. In the second half, we get more cases like this, where Meursault would like to speak about his emotions. Meursault expresses a lot of emotions toward Marie, ranging from missing her to pretending like he doesn’t care about her. But, no matter how many times he concludes that he doesn’t care about her, he always ends up thinking about her again.
The last thing, the one that I think is the biggest difference between part 1 and part 2 Meursault, is his feelings toward being judged. In the first half, we get a lot of instances where Meursault expresses his fear of being judged. He often wishes that he hadn’t said something to prevent others from judging him. In the second half, he seems to care less about what others think. Although he is aware of the crowd’s feelings toward him, he doesn’t say he is upset about being judged as he does in part one. The best example of how Meursault doesn’t fear hatred or judgment from others is right at the end of the novel when he says that “I had only to wish that there be a large crowd of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate” (123). At the beginning of the book, Meursault would have been anxious to have to hear the judgment and hatred from such a large crowd, but by the end of the novel, he is accepting of hatred from others. Meursault’s growth throughout the book is not exactly clear, but it is definitely present. By the end of the novel, he is more in tune with his emotions and he has made progress toward getting past his insecurity of being judged.
I like this line of analysis. Especially evident when looking at the last chapters, and the surprising amount of emotion we suddenly get out of Meursault. This is a definitely valid and interesting way of analyzing Meursault's character arc.
ReplyDeletethis was a really interesting takeaway from the novel I didn't really think Meursault's character development throughout the book but this really put things into a different perspective for me. I agree with you that his change wasn't very clear but thinking about it, it is apparent. I also like the way you analyzed how Meursault's desires changed throughout the novel.
ReplyDeleteI love this different take on Meursault's character! When I was reading the book, I regarded Meursault as a relatively static character who ended the novel pretty much the same way he started it (not caring about anything). However, your analysis convinces me that Meursault was more in tune with his emotions after his imprisonment. For the first time, he is forced to reflect on the future, which causes him to become more emotional. I think the best example of this was at the end, when he said that his last remaining wish was that there be a lot of people at his execution, as he wanted to see that last bit of emotion before he died. Awesome job!
ReplyDeleteI definitely think Meursault's narrative grows throughout the story, as his thoughts gain substance in part two. I noticed the long strands of thought and heightened awareness of his surroundings. However, he has these long strands of thought but still cannot say anything in court that would help him. The difference between his subconsciousness and self-expression is something that was enhanced by the change in tone of part two.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your post! I didn't really notice the length of the sentences when I was reading the book at first but I think it's really cool how much information about characters can be conveyed from things like the way their sentences are and how Meursault was more emotional in the second half. Hearing other people discuss his emotions and feelings at the trial seemed to have sort of woken him up and made him more attune to what he is actually feeling.
ReplyDelete